Though well-thought, externally introduced projects can help development; they cannot be sustained in the absence of active involvement of the people whose problems are being addressed. There is big money in these development projects. They theorise about it. For instance, teaching farming practices through video requires capable agriculture-extension officers and devoted nonprofit staff.The international poverty industry is worth trillions of US dollars a year.During the last several decades, Third World governments, backed by international aid organisations, have poured billions of dollars into cheap-credit programmes for the poor, particularly in the wake of the World Bank’s 1990 initiative to put poverty reduction at the head of its development priorities. Economists have tended to content themselves with a ridiculously simple picture of human motivation, rationality and well-being. Their poverty deprives not only them but also the rest of us of the greater value they could produce if only they were empowered. Finally, there has to be adequate access to physical capital in terms of roads, bridges, canals, warehouses and market yards, In addition to electric power and telecommunication, for financial capital to be useful.  The institutional players in the sector must set up such types of human intervention that empower the marginalised local households and communities.We need to temper our optimism about several untested interventions whose potential is grossly overvalued. Such support has to come from groups that have local knowledge. Technology has positive effects only to the extent that people are willing and able to use it positively. They’d sit in their studies and say to them, ‘What would I do if I were a horse?’"We need to actually study the horses. Thus to look at financial inclusion in an isolated way is problematic. They cannot be blamed.Most projects rarely fulfill their promise. But, in circumstances where that devotion is lacking, as in the case of corrupt government bureaucrats, or minimal capacity, as in the case of people who lack basic education, no amount of technology will turn things around. And yet those responsible for such transfers had, and in many cases continue to have, only the haziest of ideas of what they achieved, and how their interventions could have been better designed to achieve real impact. Homegrown models have greater chances of success. Ronald Coase’s poignant words in his book, The Task of the Society, sum up the modern dilemma:"Economics, over the years, has become more and more abstract and divorced from events in the real world.The writer is a member of the Niti Aayog’s National Committee on Financial Literacy and Inclusion for Women. Social entrepreneurship is another one of its kind and has become the bandwagon everybody is clambering on and every progressive politician across the country wants a piece of the development pie. It’s bursting with experts, advisors and consultants. When the community organises and identifies needs and collaborates in the formulation of strategies, they become the solution. Technology — no matter how intelligently designed — is only a magnifier of human capacity and intent but is not a substitute. Development requires sustained efforts.There is growing evidence and recognition that serving poor people requires strong commitment from organisational leaders who not only have greater intentional outreach but match their intent with action. There is a surfeit of reports, studies, books publications, PhD grants, consultancies and loans. The people in the first place have to Furniture production machine manufacture from China be healthy and educated to be productive, so that they can use finance effectively. Instead of trying to sell their ideas with vacuous phrases, professionals and practitioners would do better to discuss openly about their plans and listen to the good solutions that ordinary people have. A glaring case is of telemedicine. One has to be burning with an idea, or a problem, or a wrong that s/he wants to right. Programmes can have better outcomes through wider participation of all stakeholders, particularly local communities who can better identify their issues and problems. One has to put so much of life into this thing and there are such rough moments that most people give up. One of the causes as well as consequences of poverty and backwardness is inadequate access to all these forms of capital. If you have a resource of competent, well-intentioned people, then the appropriate technology can amplify their efforts and lead to amazing outcomes. It is now dominated by a new breed of savvy professionals calling themselves development experts. They are now realising that theory, to be of use, must keep its feet on the ground. What used to be an "aid"-based approach is now an "empowerment"-based approach that focuses on investing in local entrepreneurs who create local solutions to local problems.Economics is also undergoing a course correction. Rural development is now becoming an old-fashioned cause. Equal attention has to be paid to implementation gaps in order to achieve success. But we all know it has not been able to deliver the promised results.From the drawing board to delivery, one has to inhabit the product and the programme, living every detail as if it were a living, breathing organism. If one is not passionate enough from the start, s/he will never stick it out.There are at least five different types of capital — natural (land, water, forests, livestock, weather), human (nutrition, health, education, skills, competencies), physical (roads, buildings, plant and machinery, infrastructure), social (kinship groups, associations, trust, norms, institutions) and financial. Economists, by and large, do not study the workings of the actual economic system. They have a role to play when we develop the capacity of the people to absorb it.Merely pumping a backward region with financial capital is not going to be enough in the absence of improvements on the side of human, social and physical capital.  Economists have drifted too far from the actual world. The millions of households who constitute the rural poor are a potential source of great knowledge and creativity who, under present institutional, cultural and policy conditions, must seek only their own survival.Although imported programmes have the benefit of supplying "pre-tested" models, they are inherently risky because they may not take root in the local culture when transplanted. It is, therefore, no surprise that, taking the mission of philanthropy forward, the trending sectors within impact investing are food and agriculture, affordable housing, education, healthcare, inclusive finance, renewable energy, and women’s empowerment — the same sectors that have long been the focus of philanthropic initiatives. There has to be a substantial degree of trust and functioning institutions, in other words social capital, for economic transactions to take place in an atmosphere of confidence. One of them is technology.  The old school approach of stimulating the local economy through local resources and local talents is being frowned upon but it is now increasingly becoming clear that quick fixes advocated by market entrepreneurs don’t work. It has been touted as a revolutionary tool for curing dysfunctional rural health. In the absence of all this, merely insisting on financial inclusion will not work. This is the lesson of most social programmes the world over. Our obsession with so many shiny gadgets has hardly helped us in delivering in ways we expected. As Ely Devons, an English economist, once said at a meeting, "If economists wished to study the horse, they wouldn’t go and look at horses.It is in the light of this learning that philanthropy has undergone a steady intellectual shift with regard to international economic development models giving rise to the modern idea of impact investing. The recipients of aid need, training, hand-holding and constant and consistent mentoring to use the levers they are being provided. Designing a policy is very different from its implementation at the local level

If you had some material evidence that the commissioner of police was even remotely thinking of destroying evidence, we will come down so heavily on him, he will regret it.The  Solicitor-General  said "We issued four summons to the police commissioner who is a potential accused, he didn’t respond."CJI Gogoi, while agreeing to hear the case tomorrow, gave liberty to any person who can bring proof regarding the allegation of destruction of evidence.".New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday, while agreeing to hear on Tuesday the CBI’s application, orally observed that it would "come down heavily" on the Kolkata police commissioner Rajeev Kumar if there are materials to show that he was destroying electronic evidence in the Saradha scam probe."The CBI filed two applications seeking contempt action against the state government and direction to the police commissioner to "surrender" and extend all cooperation to the investigating agency.At the outset, Mr Tushar Mehta, appearing for CBI called the police commissioner Rajeev Kumar as a "potential China automatic woodworking edge banding machine Factory accused", which is contrary to the CBI’s official claim that it wants to question the police chief as a witness in the case. We apprehend that electronic evidence might be destroyed.When Solicitor General Tushar Mehta pressed for an urgent hearing at 2 pm on Monday itself, the CJI Ranjan Gogoi said "We have gone through your application there is nothing in it remotely suggesting that you have apprehensions of evidence being destroyed. He said that an "extraordinary situation" has unfolded in the state of Bengal where the CBI officers had been held captive by the local police and the "constitutional machinery had broken down in the state

The curriculum of this board will be drafted by a team of experts such as Dr Vijay Bhatkar, Dr Kakodkar, Swaroop Sampat, Achyut Palav among others. With maximum efforts and initiatives, Maharashtra have now jumped up to higher ranks in the world," Mr Fadnavis said.Mr Fadnavis was speaking at the launch of Atal Bihari Vajpayee International Schools, which will function under the newly-minted Maharashtra Intern-ational Education Board (MIEB), "Atalji worked hard to increase our growth rate in all sectors, especially in education.According to Mr Fadnavis, the international board will boost this trend and the students from several Panel Sawing Machine English-medium private schools, are returning to government-run ZP schools. He always insisted on bringing international standards into the rural areas.MUMBAI: Chief minister Devendra Fadnavis, said that the state is witnessing reverse migration with many private schools students returning to government-run Zilla Parishad (ZP) schools because of the ‘innovative solutions’ introduced by his government.The curriculum of the 13 ZP schools will be in mother tongue but will have English subject in order to improve the teaching and communication skills of the students."Our government improvised this education sector with same machinery, teachers and infrastructure but with innovative solutions.. We aim at capacity building, framing strategies and providing the necessary assistance," Mr Fadnavis added